Skip to main content

APM: Modeling Opex vs. Capex in LeanIX – How Do You Handle It?

  • April 1, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 61 views

Tim Böttcher

Hey everyone,

I’m looking for some guidance on how to properly model cost structures in LeanIX, especially when it comes to separating opex and capex while still maintaining a meaningful TCO view.

According to the LeanIX documentation, all costs related to acquiring the right to use an application should be entered under License Costs — regardless of whether they are one‑time investments or recurring subscription fees. All other cost types are expected to be recorded as yearly values.

This creates a challenge: Most of the costs that are aggregated (including via custom code) are annual costs, which makes them useful for identifying potential savings when rationalizing applications. However, I also want to capture a proper Total Cost of Ownership over the entire lifecycle — which should include one‑time license purchases and other upfront investments.

The problem is that these one‑time costs distort the picture when the goal is to evaluate potential savings from retiring an application. A one‑time investment cannot be “saved” again, but it does belong in a full TCO calculation.

So I’m stuck between two needs:

  • A complete TCO view including all costs over the application’s lifetime (opex + capex)

  • A clear view of annual savings potential when decommissioning an application (opex only)

LeanIX’s standard template doesn’t really support a clean opex/capex separation.

One idea I’m considering is adding custom fields (e.g., Investment Costs for capex) to the TCO extension. But these values wouldn’t appear in standard dashboards or reports, which limits their usefulness.

Has anyone found a practical way to model this distinction in LeanIX?

I’d love to hear how others handle one‑time license costs, lifecycle TCO, and savings calculations in a consistent way.

Thanks in advance for any insights you can share.

 

Kind regards,

Tim

3 replies

Steen Jensen
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Royalty For Loyalty
  • April 3, 2026

The model/framework of TBM (Technical Business Management) have a good model for cost of IT-services and products.

LeanIX did only use TBMs categories i the Tech Catagories. But as TIME or 6R is its own feild in the Application Factsheet, the TBMs field for cost pool should be used with the new TCO meta extension.

We are investigate if it a value for us to have the  TBM model as “proper” cost model in LeanIX.

Some one have to be owner and maintain it over time.


Tim Böttcher

Hi Steen,

thank you for your response. I’ve taken a brief look at IBM’s TBM model and, at the moment, I don’t think it fully fits my needs. For the first step, I mainly need rough estimates to understand where a deeper analysis would be worthwhile.

After enabling the TCO Meta Model Extension, I wasn’t able to find the Cost Pools any or other artifacts from the TBM framework in the metamodel. Is there perhaps a newer version of the extension, or am I missing something?

LeanIX is not our primary tool for capturing or managing costs. However, since the Application fact sheet in LeanIX provides a comprehensive view of all IT components required to support a Business Capability, it still seems like a suitable place to maintain this information. We currently don’t have another system that offers such an aggregated view.

If you have any additional thoughts or further insights on how you approach this, I’d be very interested to hear them.

 

Best regards, Tim


Steen Jensen
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Royalty For Loyalty
  • April 7, 2026

My idea is that create a section “CostPool” and add those fields from TBM v 4.1 . TBM v 5 have severel more fields, but for ouer need those field would be  better than LeanIX TCO example. And maybe add some of the TBM 5 fields later.

What I was meening is that LeanIX should make the TCO option more TBM compliant, as they did with Gartners TIME and 5R.
TBM Url: https://www.tbmcouncil.org/taxonomy/