Recently active topics

Hi Team,I noticed the release notes in our LeanIX workspace about the new MCP update (Visual List, Detail View, and Relation Explorer), but I am having trouble getting the visual components to render inside Microsoft Copilot Chat.The AI terms are signed and the MCP server is active. The AI agent even triggers the tool and says: "The Relation Explorer for [App Name] is now open. You can interactively explore all its connections..."However, no visual UI or interactive component actually appears in the chat window - it just stays as text.Is Microsoft Copilot Chat fully supported for the UI rendering of this new MCP update yet, or is this feature currently only possible with Claude AI? see screenshot below 👇 

Hey Everyone,I want to Connect LeanIX with Gemini Enterprise.I referred Both LeanIX Official Doc as well as Gemini Enterprise Doc (https://docs.cloud.google.com/gemini/enterprise/docs/connectors/custom-mcp-server/set-up-custom-mcp-server)Now, I randomly Tried All the URLs I found on Internet.Gemini Enterprise Setup ScreenNow, Can any one help what will be the Authorization URL,Token URL, Client ID/Secret. As in LeanIX there is no such Fields present. Just to Give you Context:Our SSO Authorization is Entra.  Also, I tried connecting it with Copilot Studio as well, and I just put mcp server url and selected Oauth and maybe using dynamic Discovery or something it automatically got connected with Copilot.

We're using the "LeanIX Integration for Confluence" add-on on our Confluence Data Center to display LeanIX content in Confluence pages. We're preparing for a migration from Confluence Data Center to Cloud and want those pages with embedded LeanIX content to continue working after the migration.Is there any official SAP LeanIX documentation covering this topic? The only resource I could find is the Confluence Integration guide, which is a how-to guide but doesn't mention Cloud migration at all, specifically, whether the macros used in pages will break after migration or whether any manual adjustments are needed.

We have 2 business units. We require a solution that Business 1’s Factsheets are not visible to Business 2 in a single instance. we have explored the Virtual Workspace and the Separate tenant option, but we need further options if we have?   

Hi all, I’m trying to document the Reference Standard for Business Capability and Technical capability in LeanIX.By Reference Standards, I mean ‘Prescribed or preferred technology, design, data, and process elements that conform to architectural principles, and that can be used to build the Solution Design’For example, I have 4 different solutions in my landscape for Identity Management, each catering to different needs but they are the standards/preferred for that capability. As a solution architect, one should be able to look at this repository to build the Identity Architecture for the solution.I have the same question for Business Capability as well. One way can be to add a new tag but it’s going to be a lot of maintenance, same with enabling Leading and Supporting capabilities.Appreciate if any one can share best practices used for this use-case. Thanks,Shanthi 

Hi all, General question concerning the expected behavior of the Integration Users vs Quality Seal. As Admins ( UI users) can change any fact sheets without breaking the quality seal. And Admins (technical users) can change fact sheets without breaking the quality seal. If my technical user is a “member” (i.e.not Admin) with limited scope on only specific fact sheets and updates fact sheets using APIs, will it break the quality seal?  I'm a bit cautious in using Admin in integrations as those users should normally only have scopes to manipulate fact sheets and nothing else. 

Hi everyone, thank you for joining in our recent webinar “Simplify Your App Portfolio with SAP LeanIX”.Please find the recording here. We look forward to seeing you in our next session.

Hi Community, ​​​​​​I am working on getting the ServiceNow integration with IT Component fact sheets Software working. Anyone who has done this is aware of the aggregation challenges. We are using SAMPro, so I am using the cmdb_sam_sw_discovery table as the primary table.  Looks fine.  However, the aggregated product name is a reference field as opposed to normalized text.  This is normal in ServiceNow. SAP LeanIX indicates that dot walking is possible (ServiceNow Integration: Advanced Configuration | SAP Help Portal). I made the Advanced modifications to the JSON (two different ways as the documentation presents the information in two different configuration - sweet right? ) "fieldMapping": {                "mapping": {                    "name": {                        "fieldType": "FOREIGN_FIELD",                        "foreignFieldName": "norm_product.prod_name",                        "useNormalDirection": true,                        "referenceTable": "samp_sw_product"         

Hello, I am curious to know if anyone has faced an issue when trying to download their diagrams through the API. My XML formatting is different when opened on draw.io, and images in those diagrams are not accepted, losing some information along the way. Has anyone had this issue and been able to solve it?  

How does this resonate with you? Any one else that has been having same/similar idea?Tiered quality seal for applications, where the criteria vary depending on the application type, category, business criticality, and governance requirements?This would assist to  drive various use cases as a differentiated Application Quality Seal enables us to apply the right level of governance to the right type of application — from standard business applications and SaaS services to AI-enabled solutions, autonomous agents, integrations, critical systems, and retirement candidates.This would strengthen LeanIX position as a decision engine for trust, risk, lifecycle, compliance, and portfolio optimization.So the opportunity is to move from - “Has the application factsheet been approved?” to - “Has this type of application met the right evidence standard for its role, risk, and lifecycle?”