Recently active topics

Hi everyone, thank you for joining in our recent webinar “Simplify Your App Portfolio with SAP LeanIX”.Please find the recording here. We look forward to seeing you in our next session.

Hi all, General question concerning the expected behavior of the Integration Users vs Quality Seal. As Admins ( UI users) can change any fact sheets without breaking the quality seal. And Admins (technical users) can change fact sheets without breaking the quality seal. If my technical user is a “member” (i.e.not Admin) with limited scope on only specific fact sheets and updates fact sheets using APIs, will it break the quality seal?  I'm a bit cautious in using Admin in integrations as those users should normally only have scopes to manipulate fact sheets and nothing else. 

We have 2 business units. We require a solution that Business 1’s Factsheets are not visible to Business 2 in a single instance. we have explored the Virtual Workspace and the Separate tenant option, but we need further options if we have?   

Hi Community, ​​​​​​I am working on getting the ServiceNow integration with IT Component fact sheets Software working. Anyone who has done this is aware of the aggregation challenges. We are using SAMPro, so I am using the cmdb_sam_sw_discovery table as the primary table.  Looks fine.  However, the aggregated product name is a reference field as opposed to normalized text.  This is normal in ServiceNow. SAP LeanIX indicates that dot walking is possible (ServiceNow Integration: Advanced Configuration | SAP Help Portal). I made the Advanced modifications to the JSON (two different ways as the documentation presents the information in two different configuration - sweet right? ) "fieldMapping": {                "mapping": {                    "name": {                        "fieldType": "FOREIGN_FIELD",                        "foreignFieldName": "norm_product.prod_name",                        "useNormalDirection": true,                        "referenceTable": "samp_sw_product"         

Hello, I am curious to know if anyone has faced an issue when trying to download their diagrams through the API. My XML formatting is different when opened on draw.io, and images in those diagrams are not accepted, losing some information along the way. Has anyone had this issue and been able to solve it?  

Hi Team,I noticed the release notes in our LeanIX workspace about the new MCP update (Visual List, Detail View, and Relation Explorer), but I am having trouble getting the visual components to render inside Microsoft Copilot Chat.The AI terms are signed and the MCP server is active. The AI agent even triggers the tool and says: "The Relation Explorer for [App Name] is now open. You can interactively explore all its connections..."However, no visual UI or interactive component actually appears in the chat window - it just stays as text.Is Microsoft Copilot Chat fully supported for the UI rendering of this new MCP update yet, or is this feature currently only possible with Claude AI? see screenshot below 👇 

How does this resonate with you? Any one else that has been having same/similar idea?Tiered quality seal for applications, where the criteria vary depending on the application type, category, business criticality, and governance requirements?This would assist to  drive various use cases as a differentiated Application Quality Seal enables us to apply the right level of governance to the right type of application — from standard business applications and SaaS services to AI-enabled solutions, autonomous agents, integrations, critical systems, and retirement candidates.This would strengthen LeanIX position as a decision engine for trust, risk, lifecycle, compliance, and portfolio optimization.So the opportunity is to move from - “Has the application factsheet been approved?” to - “Has this type of application met the right evidence standard for its role, risk, and lifecycle?”

Hey Everyone,I want to Connect LeanIX with Gemini Enterprise.I referred Both LeanIX Official Doc as well as Gemini Enterprise Doc (https://docs.cloud.google.com/gemini/enterprise/docs/connectors/custom-mcp-server/set-up-custom-mcp-server)Now, I randomly Tried All the URLs I found on Internet.Gemini Enterprise Setup ScreenNow, Can any one help what will be the Authorization URL,Token URL, Client ID/Secret. As in LeanIX there is no such Fields present. Just to Give you Context:Our SSO Authorization is Entra.  Also, I tried connecting it with Copilot Studio as well, and I just put mcp server url and selected Oauth and maybe using dynamic Discovery or something it automatically got connected with Copilot.

When the updates are releasing for Inventory: Subtype-specific permissions

Hi Community,Does anyone know how to access the Demo Workspace? I used it for the practitioner course, but it’s no longer available via the link: https://academy.leanix.net/welcome-to-leanix-eam-practitioner-level-1/1797710I’d like access to a demo workspace.

Brisbane - 9th of JuneJoin us at our Enterprise Architecture Exchange in Brisbane! Don’t miss out and register here!This interactive session brings together our diverse LeanIX user community to share real experiences, exchange practical knowledge, and learn together in a non-sales, peer-led environment.Your Input MattersLet us know about topics you’d like to see covered during the roundtable discussion by commenting below.Enhanced Event FormatWe are teaming up with our Business Process colleagues from Signavio. Join us in the morning for our Business Process Exchange, follwed by the Enterprise Architecture Exchange in the afternoon.Brisbane Registration Business Process ExchangeBrisbane Registration Enterprise Architecture ExchangeBrisbane Combined AgendaSignavio - Business Process 09:00 Registration09:15 Expert presentation. Speaker: ​Richard Young10:30 Customer Presentation / Fireside: Powerlink & Brisbane City Council11:15 Roundtable: Moderator: Federica Tomaselli12:30 Networkin

Hi everyone,I’m currently working with the LeanIX API and trying to clean up ToDos in an automated way.My specific use case is:I want to filter ToDos by a specific user (assignee/responsible person) and then delete exactly those ToDos via the APIFrom what I understand so far, the API only allows deleting ToDos by ID (one by one). So the approach would be:Query all ToDos with a filter (e.g. by assignee) Extract the IDs Delete each ToDo individuallyHowever, I have a few open questions:Is there a recommended way to filter ToDos by assignee (GraphQL or REST)? Is there any bulk delete option available that I might be missing? Are there best practices for handling this kind of cleanup (e.g. performance, pagination, rate limits)?Would really appreciate any examples or guidance!Thanks in advance 🙂

Hi everyone, I’m currently using the LeanIX REST API to retrieve Application fact sheets, and in our setup the applications are synced from ServiceNow to LeanIX, so each Application should have a corresponding ServiceNow record with a sys_id; however, when calling /services/pathfinder/v1/factSheets?type=Application, the response only contains LeanIX-specific attributes like id, name, and fields, but no ServiceNow sys_id, so I’m wondering whether it can be accessed through the REST API and what the recommended approach is to retrieve or expose this value if it is not returned by default.

Hi All, We would like to use the notifications purely for notifications in internal communication. Not to show the product updates, those can be communicated by the application Administrators.Is it possible to turn them off, most of our users experience them as a distraction 

Hi all - I am needing to adjust the name of a Subscription Role (in my case, I want to change “SDP/Sr IT Leader” to simply “Sr IT Leader”).The only issue I have encountered is with existing saved searches that display that role. The column header still displays the old name unless I edit the search to remove and then re-add the role. Any solutions that don’t require me to manually go through all saved searches to remove/re-add the subscription role?

I was doing some checks and noticed that it's no longer possible to update in blocks of lines in some fields.Previously, I could update normally between organization and business capacity, but in this example, only the description is possible.Does anyone know why this is happening?I did some tests and, in new applications, the field referring to the organization does not appear in the factsheet to relate.However, in older applications that do not have an associated organization, the field appears normally.In this case, does the "completeness" of the factsheet interfere with whether or not the field appears? 

Hi everyone, I want to provide a clickable e-mail address with predefined subject in a custom message on a dashboard.With this format, without subject, it works well: [Email Me](mailto:email%40domain.com)But, with an additional subject like this: [Email Me](mailto:email%40domain.com?subject=LeanIX)  the subject is ignored. I’m not using markdown at another place therefore I can not test if this is a special markdown behaviour or not. But on other pages like Confluence it works well. Maybe someone of you can help with this nice to have of a predefined subject.  Many thanks Kind regardsJan

Hello LeanIX Community,I am currently running into a puzzling issue related to data integrations and automation behavior in LeanIX, and I wanted to ask if anyone else has experienced something similar or has insight into the cause.BackgroundWe are integrating application data from ServiceNow into LeanIX. In LeanIX, I set up two automations that trigger upon application integration:One automation applies an Operational Status tag of Operational The other applies an Operational Status tag of RetiredThese automations are driven by a field in ServiceNow called Operational Status, which contains values such as Operational, Retired.The IssueOut of 4,087 applications integrated from ServiceNow, 266 applications had their Operational Status tags removed after initially being applied.When reviewing the affected fact sheets:The tags were correctly created by the system user automation-workflow, which indicates that the automations executed as expected The tag removal shows as being performed by

We are working with our business partners to focus on business capability maturity.  As part of this, they would like to capture high level status for their efforts to achieve capability uplift.  This is based upon a small number of initiatives, under which the business capabilities are grouped together with their related processes.  In the Initiative factsheet, we have the possibility to capture project status (Red/Yellow/Green), % completion and a description.  However, I have encountered a couple of problems:-There seems to be no way in LeanIX reporting to present the descriptive text that accompanies the RYG status Using export/import from inventory view, while exporting the RYG is possible, you cannot export/import % completion or description and you also cannot import RYG status. LeanIX displays ‘exporting expanded project status fields is not supported yet’ if you attempt to export, and if you try to import RYG, it says 0 updates were madeIs there any way to extract/visualise th

Dear community, I would like to remove the subscription role "IT Owner" from the fact sheet type "Application".In the meta model configuration the role is not defined as mandatory anymore. None of the fact sheets of type "Application" have this role populated. Nevertheless, but I still receive an error message.What am I missing? 

I am currently studying the SAP Learning Hub course "Adding First Data to Your SAP LeanIX Workspace". In the step "Identify fact sheet owners and add them to your workspace", the tutorial describes creating a survey to collect missing information.However, I am encountering an issue: when I follow the steps exactly, no survey email is sent. The tutorial mentions sending the survey for fields marked as N/A, but in my tests, emails are only sent when the "Responsible" field is already populated.My questions are:Must the "Responsible" (or target) field be pre-filled for the survey email to be triggered?If I have 300 applications and none have subscription emails populated, will this survey method fail to reach any stakeholders?The hint states: "To be able to use this method, your in-scope applications must already be populated in the workspace." This seems contradictory because the tutorial then instructs filtering for N/A fields. Is the documentation incomplete, or am I misunderstanding t